Legal Opinion

Moss v. Jannetti Body Co., Inc.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 10, 1930No. Appeal 186PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Cunningham, J.,

Defendant was engaged in the business of conducting an automobile conditioning plant in Philadelphia; its president, Albert Jannetti, acted for it in the mat ters out of which this case arose. In order that certain painting might he completed, plaintiff placed in defendant’s custody for one day, May 16, 1929, her Nash cabriolet; it had an enclosed seat in front and a rumble seat, which could be folded and closed into a compartment, in the rear. During the afternoon, the car, with its contents, was stolen; several days later it was recovered by the police but the rear…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Woodruff v. Painter & EldridgeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1892
  2. Hunter v. ReedSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1899
  3. McKnight v. Snellenburg & Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1922

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. American Enka Company, in No. 82-1080 v. Wicaco MacHine Corp. American Enka Company v. Wicaco MacHine Corp., in No. 82-1109Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
  2. Mee v. Sley System Garages, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  3. Willis v. JensenUtah Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Fidelman-Danziger, Inc. v. Statler Management, Inc., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Alleghany County1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API