Legal Opinion

Hunter v. Reed

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 11, 1899No. Appeal, No. 39PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal, No. 39, Oct. T., 1899, by-defendants, from judgment of C. P. No. 4, Phila. Co., June T., 1897, No. 1329, on verdict for plaintiff. Assumpsit. Before Willson, J. It appears from the record that plaintiff brought an action to recover the value of a diamond ring and for certain moneys taken from the pocket of plaintiff’s clothes left by him in a, dressing-room in defendants’ establishment while trying on a new suit with a view to purchase.

Read the full summary

Appeal, No. 39, Oct. T., 1899, by-defendants, from judgment of C. P. No. 4, Phila. Co., June T., 1897, No. 1329, on verdict for plaintiff. Assumpsit. Before Willson, J. It appears from the record that plaintiff brought an action to recover the value of a diamond ring and for certain moneys taken from the pocket of plaintiff’s clothes left by him in a, dressing-room in defendants’ establishment while trying on a new suit with a view to purchase. The facts appear at length in the opinion of the court. Defendants submitted, among others, the following point: [1. Under all the evidence the…

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Orlady, J.,

The defendants conducted a large retail clothing store, which occupied four contiguous buildings, and were disposing of their stock of goods preparatory to removing the business to another location. Through the inducement of reduced prices a large number of customers were attracted, requiring additional salesmen.

In order to expedite the sales, six dressing-rooms or booths, in which to make exchanges of clothing, were arranged in the store, and in each was placed a notice in the following form: “We are not responsible for articles left in the dressing closets. Jacob Reed’s…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bunnell v. . SternNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  2. Woodruff v. Painter & EldridgeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1892
  3. Morris v. Third Avenue RailroadNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1862

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. American Enka Company, in No. 82-1080 v. Wicaco MacHine Corp. American Enka Company v. Wicaco MacHine Corp., in No. 82-1109Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
  2. Mee v. Sley System Garages, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  3. Moss v. Jannetti Body Co., Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  4. Fidelman-Danziger, Inc. v. Statler Management, Inc., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Alleghany County1956
  5. Thompson v. Mobile Light . R. CoAlabama Court of Appeals · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API