Legal Opinion

Wendt v. Sley System Garages

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 12, 1936No. Appeal, 41PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Baldrige, J.,

The plaintiff drove his automobile into an open parking lot operated by the defendant, paying a fee of 10 cents. He received a ticket or check, which stated :.“Not responsible for fire or theft. All valuables must be checked.” About 5 o’clock when he returned for his car, he found it had been stolen. It was recovered the next day, with some of the equipment missing. Plaintiff brought this suit, alleging that the defendant, as bailee, had failed to exercise ordinary diligence in the care of the chattel bailed. A trial in the municipal court before Tumolillo, J., sitting…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Zell v. DunkleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
  2. Langford v. NevinTexas Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Sporsem v. First National Bank of PoulsboWashington Supreme Court · 1925
  4. England v. Lyon Fireproof Storage Co.California Court of Appeal · 1928
  5. Logan v. MathewsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1847

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Dilks v. Flohr ChevroletSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  2. Malone v. SantoraSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1949
  3. Schell v. Miller North Broad Storage Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  4. Phillips Home Furnishings, Inc. v. Continental BankSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  5. Shamrock Hilton Hotel v. CaranasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1972

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API