Legal Opinion

State v. Hailstock

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided August 2, 1972No. 725SC541PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRITT, Judge.

Defendant contends that the court erred in not instructing the jury as to lesser degrees of the crime of armed robbery. We do not agree with this contention.

The State’s evidence tended to show: Defendant entered the Zip Mart on Princess Place Drive in Wilmington, North Carolina, at about 10:30 p.m. on 22 October 1971. When defendant was checking out his purchase and Chester Hayes, the cashier, opened the cash register drawer, defendant drew a sawed-off, double barrel shotgun on Hayes and said: “Hand me all your money. Don’t try anything or I’ll blow your brains out.” Defendant…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. PhillipSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  2. State v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  3. State v. . CreechSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  4. State v. CreechSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  5. State v. WortheySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. HortonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
  2. State v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975
  3. State v. ElliottCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975
  4. State v. GoodeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API