State v. Martin

Defendants have set out no exceptions in their assignments of error. Four of their assignments of error are addressed to alleged errors in the court’s charge. The charge is not, however, set out in the record. While these are plain and obvious failures to comply with sections (a) and (c) of Rule 19, Rules of Practice in the Court of Appeals of North Carolina, we have considered each assignment of error and find each to be without merit.

Defendants’ contention that the allowance in evidence of Mr. Davis’ testimony that “my wife, she was hollerin’ to the top of her voice, ‘we have been robbed,…