Legal Opinion
Millsap v. McDonell Douglas Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided May 21, 2004No. 03-5124PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BALDOCK, Circuit Judge.
Section 510 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, 29 U.S.C. §§ 1001-1461 (ERISA), proscribes interference with a participant’s rights under a qualified benefit plan. Section 502(a)(3) of ERISA provides the plan participant with his exclusive remedies for a § 510 violation. Under § 502(a)(3), the participant may bring a civil action to (1) enjoin any act or practice which violates any provision of Title I of ERISA or the terms of the plan, or (2) obtain other appropriate equitable relief to redress such violations or enforce any provisions of Title I of…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Pilot Life Insurance v. DedeauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Albemarle Paper Co. v. MoodySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- National Labor Relations Board v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Elm Ridge Exploration Company v. EngleCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
- Felix v. Lucent Technologies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
- Lind v. Aetna Health, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
- Jerry D. Walker v. Jaci S. WalkerWyoming Supreme Court · 2013
- Callery v. United States Life Insurance Co. of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.