Tilden Holliday v. Commonwealth Brands, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM: *
Plaintiff-Appellant Tilden Holliday appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment to Defendant-Appellee Commonwealth Brands, Inc. (“CBI”) on his claim under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (“ADEA”). Holliday claims that CBI terminated his employment because of his age and hired someone younger to replace him. The district court determined that even assuming Holliday had established a prima facie age discrimination claim, he had not shown that CBI’s purported reason for terminating him — his poor performance — was a pretext for unlawful discrimination. We affirm.
I…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Gross v. FBL Financial Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Staub v. Proctor HospitalSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Russell v. McKinney Hosp. VentureCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Christopher Zamora v. City of HoustonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2015
- Harkness v. Bauhaus U.S.A., Inc.District Court, N.D. Mississippi · 2015
- Murphy v. Center for Emergency Medicine of Western Pennsylvania, Inc.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2013
- Samsel v. Desoto County School DistrictDistrict Court, N.D. Mississippi · 2017
- Kent Kean v. Jack Henry & Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2014
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.