Legal Opinion

Harkness v. Bauhaus U.S.A., Inc.

District Court, N.D. Mississippi

Decided February 6, 2015No. 3:13-CV-00129-DMB-SAAPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER DENYING SUMMARY JUDGMENT

DEBRA M. BROWN, District Judge.

This is an age discrimination action brought by Plaintiff June Harkness 'against her former employer, Defendant Bauhaus U.S.A., Inc. Doc. # 1. Plaintiff alleges that Defendant wrongfully terminated her employment in violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967, 29 U.S.C. § 621 et seq. Id. Before the Court is Defendant’s motion for summary judgment. Doc. # 43.

I

Summary Judgment Standard

“Summary judgment is appropriate when there are no genuine issues as to any material facts, and the moving party is…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Little v. Liquid Air Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
  4. Staub v. Proctor HospitalSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  5. Fed. Carr. Cas. P 84,067 Tex Morris Cindy Sagrera Morris v. Covan World Wide Moving, Incorporated Coleman American Moving Services, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Cash v. Walgreen Co.District Court, N.D. Mississippi · 2020
  2. Ford v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LPDistrict Court, N.D. Mississippi · 2022
  3. Jennifer Garcia v. Randolph-Brooks Federal Credit UnionDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 2020
  4. Levier v. C B & I L L CDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 2022
  5. Mitchell v. The TJX Companies, Inc.District Court, N.D. Mississippi · 2019

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API