Legal Opinion

State v. Doughman

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided December 7, 1983No. C6-83-1197PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FOLEY, Judge.

This is an appeal from a postconviction order of the Ninth Judicial District Court denying appellant’s request to vacate his conviction for sale of a controlled substance and to permit him to withdraw his guilty plea. We affirm.

On October 26, 1982, appellant Kurt Doughman pled guilty to a charge of sale of a controlled substance. At the time of his plea appellant was on probation for two prior criminal convictions, felony theft and fleeing a police officer. He had pled guilty to both crimes and had signed a “Petition to Plead Guilty” for both. However, appellant had moved…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Kochevar v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  3. United States of America Ex Rel. John McGrath v. J. E. Lavallee, Warden of Clinton Prison, Dannemora, New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1965
  4. State v. LorentzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Doughman v. StateCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
  2. State v. KaiserSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1991
  3. State v. LopezCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
  4. Herme v. StateCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
  5. Marshall v. StateCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API