State v. Doughman
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FOLEY, Judge.
This is an appeal from a postconviction order of the Ninth Judicial District Court denying appellant’s request to vacate his conviction for sale of a controlled substance and to permit him to withdraw his guilty plea. We affirm.
On October 26, 1982, appellant Kurt Doughman pled guilty to a charge of sale of a controlled substance. At the time of his plea appellant was on probation for two prior criminal convictions, felony theft and fleeing a police officer. He had pled guilty to both crimes and had signed a “Petition to Plead Guilty” for both. However, appellant had moved…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Kochevar v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- United States of America Ex Rel. John McGrath v. J. E. Lavallee, Warden of Clinton Prison, Dannemora, New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1965
- State v. LorentzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
3Cited by18 opinions
- Doughman v. StateCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
- State v. KaiserSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1991
- State v. LopezCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
- Herme v. StateCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
- Marshall v. StateCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.