Legal Opinion
Abex Corporation v. Brinkley
Superior Court of Delaware
Decided April 3, 1969PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
O’HORA, Judge.
The employer herein appeals from a decision of the Industrial Accident Board denying its petition'to terminate temporary total disability payments to claimant Brinkley.
As grounds for terminating total disability payments employer alleged the availability of employment “commensurate with [claimant’s] qualifications and training.” Federal Bake Shop, Inc. v. Maczynski, 4 Storey 484, 180 A.2d 615 (Super.Ct.1962). No charge or improvement in claimant’s physical condition 1 was alleged.
The employer admits that, having made payments for total disability, it had the burden of…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Watkins v. Prudential InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
- Unora v. Glen Alden Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
- Petrone v. Moffat Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
- Ham v. Chrysler CorporationSupreme Court of Delaware · 1967
- M. A. Hartnett, Inc. v. ColemanSupreme Court of Delaware · 1967
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Washington Post v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
- Franklin Fabricators v. IrwinSupreme Court of Delaware · 1973
- Campos v. Daisy Construction Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2014
- Duff v. Chrysler CorporationSuperior Court of Delaware · 1972
- Howard University Hospital v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.