Legal Opinion
Washington Post v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided April 18, 1996No. 95-AA-228PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SCHWELB, Associate Judge:
On November 9,1994, following an eviden-tiary hearing, a hearing and appeals examiner of the District of Columbia Department of Employment Services (DOES or the agency) found that intervenor Adil Mukhtar, who was formerly employed by petitioner, The Washington Post (the Post), had suffered temporary total disability as a result of a work-related injury. The examiner issued a compensation order based upon that finding. The Post filed an internal appeal of the compensation order, but the order became final when no final decision was issued by the Director within…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
- Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Lee v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
- Hughes v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Upchurch v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2001
- Logan v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2002
- Mills v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2003
- Negussie v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
- Harris v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2000
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.