Aguilera v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtShepard, J.
Plaintiffs brought this action for damages for the death of Angel Aguilera, which occurred in a railway crossing accident. Nonsuit was granted at the close of plaintiff’s evidence, and plaintiffs appeal.
Nonsuit Evidence Rule
The rule is that on a motion for nonsuit at the close of the plan tiff’s evidence, the evidence must be viewed in the light most favorable to the plaintiffs, giving to the support of plaintiffs’ case every applicable presumption of law and every inference reasonably deducible from the evidence ; that all conflicts in the evidence are to be disregarded, and that unless the…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Smellie v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1931
- Westberg v. WilldeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
- Anthony v. HobbieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- Mar Shee v. Maryland Assurance Corp.California Supreme Court · 1922
- Brandelius v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Elder v. Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co.California Court of Appeal · 1977
- Hogue v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1969
- Gong v. Firemen's InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- Hargiss v. Royal Air Properties, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1962
- Grimes v. Southern Pacific Co.California Court of Appeal · 1966
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.