Legal Opinion
Norfolk Southern Corp. v. Oberly
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided April 8, 1986No. Civ. A. 84-330 MMSPublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MURRAY M. SCHWARTZ, Chief Judge.
Plaintiffs seek declaratory and injunctive relief preventing the defendant state officials from administering and enforcing against them the Delaware Coastal Zone Act (“the Delaware CZA”), 7 Del.C.Ann.' § 7001 et seq., which prohibits plaintiffs’ proposed activities in the Delaware coastal zone. Pending are cross-motions for summary judgment. 1
I. Factual Overview
Plaintiffs 2 seek to improve the competitiveness of their coal-exporting operations by establishing a coal “top-off” service at Big Stone Anchorage, which lies off the coast of Delaware in…
2Cases cited57 opinions
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Hunt v. Washington State Apple Advertising CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Gibbons v. OgdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- TRI-M GROUP, LLC v. SharpCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2011
- Norfolk Southern Corp. v. OberlyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
- House v. New Castle CountyDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1993
- Smith v. Financial Collection AgenciesDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1991
- New Castle County v. Halliburton NUS Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1995
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.