Legal Opinion

Smith v. Financial Collection Agencies

District Court, D. Delaware

Decided April 10, 1991No. Civ. A. 90-120 LONPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LONGOBARDI, Chief Judge.

This is an action for actual and statutory damages brought by Plaintiffs Joseph and Deborah Smith against Defendant Financial Collection Agencies (“FCA”) alleging various violations of the Fair Debt Collections Practices Act (the “FDCPA”), 15 U.S.C. § 1692. Defendant has moved for partial summary judgment on the question of whether two letters sent to the Plaintiffs by the Defendant are in conformance with the validation notice and debt collection warning provisions of the FDCPA. The Court has jurisdiction pursuant to 15 U.S.C. § 1692k(d) and 28 U.S.C. § 1331.

I. FACTS

By…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. In re Japanese Electronic Products Antitrust LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Donna M. Russell v. Equifax A.R.S., and Cbi CollectionsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
  2. Jacobson v. Healthcare Financial Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
  3. Adams v. Law Offices of Stuckert & YatesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1996
  4. Harrison v. NBD INC.District Court, E.D. New York · 1997
  5. Rabideau v. Management Adjustment BureauDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1992

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API