Legal Opinion
New Castle County v. Halliburton NUS Corp.
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided October 6, 1995No. Civ. A. 93-504-LONPublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LONGOBARDI, Chief Judge.
I. NATURE AND STAGE OF THE PROCEEDINGS
Plaintiffs 1 incurred cleanup obligations when they entered into a consent agreement to settle a lawsuit brought by the EPA relating to the Tybout’s Corner landfill site (the “Landfill”), United States v. New Castle County, et al., Civil Action No. 80-489 (LON) (the “USA action”). In the case sub judice, Plaintiffs seek to recover some of those costs from Defendant, Halliburton NUS Corporation (“NUS”).
Prior to the signing of the consent agreement, NUS contracted with the EPA to perform a Remedial Investigation/Feasibility…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- In re Japanese Electronic Products Antitrust LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- United States v. Compaction Systems Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2000
- New Castle County Rhone-Poulenc, Inc., Zeneca, Inc. v. Halliburton Nus CorpCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
- United States of America and State of Indiana v. Navistar International Transportation CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
- SC Holdings, Inc. v. A.A.A. Realty Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1996
- Clear Lake Properties v. Rockwell International Corp.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1997
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.