Legal Opinion

Connors v. Middle Fork Corp.

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided March 24, 1992No. Civ. A. No. 89-0698 (GHR)PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND OPINION

REVERCOMB, District Judge.

I

This is an ERISA1 case involving an employer’s liability for withdrawing from a multiemployer pension plan. It arises out of the withdrawal of Middle Fork Corporation (“Middle Fork”), in April 1987, from the United Mine Workers of America 1950 and 1974 Pension Plans (“the Plans”), which are multiemployer pension plans under ERISA, 29 U.S.C. §§ 1002(37), 1301(a)(3). Middle Fork is a Virginia corporation engaged in the business of producing and processing coal, and was a signatory employer to the National Bituminous Coal Wage Agreements of 1981…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Martin v. PeytonNew York Court of Appeals · 1927
  4. Joseph P. Connors, Sr. v. P & M Coal CompanyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1986
  5. Connors v. Calvert Development Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 1985

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission v. Vitol IncDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API