Legal Opinion

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission v. Vitol Inc

District Court, E.D. California

Decided August 10, 2020No. 2:20-cv-00040Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY No. 2:20-CV-00040-KJM-AC COMMISSION, 12 Plaintiff, 13 ORDER v. 14 VITOL, INC., et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Third parties move for leave to file a brief as amici curiae. ECF No. 42. 18 Specifically, Edison Electric Institute (“EEI”), Electric Power Supply Association (“EPSA”), and 19 Energy Trading Institute (“ETI”) (collectively “Amici”) seek leave to file a brief in support of 20 defendant’s motion to dismiss, ECF No. 30. For the foregoing reasons, the court GRANTS the 21 motion. 22…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hoptowit v. RayCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
  2. Northern Securities Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  3. NGV Gaming, Ltd. v. Upstream Point Molate, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2005
  4. FERC v. Powhatan Energy Fund, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2020
  5. Connors v. Middle Fork Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API