Pam, S.P.A. v. United States Department of Commerce
United States Court of International Trade
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BARZILAY, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff PAM S.p.A. (“PAM”) 1 filed a USCIT R. 56.2 Motion for Judgment Upon an Agency Record, challenging certain aspects of the Department of Commerce’s (“Commerce” or “Department”) determinations in the antidumping administrative review that it conducted concerning PAM. See Notice of Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, Partial Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Revocation of Anti-dumping Duty Order in Part: Certain Pasta From Italy, 67 Fed.Reg. 300 (Jan. 3, 2002) (“Final Results”). This Court…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Edward J. DeBartolo Corp. v. Florida Gulf Coast Building & Construction Trades CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- National Labor Relations Board v. Catholic BishopSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. The United States and Zenith Radio CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Usinor, Beautor, Haironville, Sollac Atlantique, Sollac Lorraine v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2004
- Nsk Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2004
- Nucor Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2009
- Nsk Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2005
- NMB Singapore Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2007