Legal Opinion

Brown v. Manufacturers Hanover Trust Co.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided November 16, 1984No. 82 Civ. 8051 (GLG)PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GOETTEL, District Judge:

The plaintiff brought this pro se action pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. (1982) (“Title VII”), alleging that she was discharged in retaliation for opposing an unlawful discriminatory practice. The defendant now moves pursuant to Fed.R. Civ.P. 56 for summary judgment on the grounds that the doctrine of res judicata bars the litigation. For the reasons stated below, we grant the defendant’s motion.

Background

The defendant, a bank, employed the plaintiff as an Administrative Assistant from April 17, 1981, until…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Kremer v. Chemical Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Parkhurst v. . BerdellNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
  3. Rodriguez v. BeameDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1976
  4. Sullivan v. George Ringler & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902
  5. Sullivan v. George Ringler & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Tobias v. First City National Bank & Trust Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1989
  2. Weissman v. FruchtmanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1987
  3. Deutsch v. Integrated Barter International, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1988
  4. Antonious v. MuhammadDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1995
  5. Papapietro v. ClottDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2023

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API