Legal Opinion
Antonious v. Muhammad
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided January 19, 1995No. 91 Civ. 2899 (JES)PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
SPRIZZO, District Judge.
Plaintiffs Nashaat N. Antonious (“Antonious”) and Soheir F. Antonious (collectively “plaintiffs”) bring this action against Dawud Muhammad, Goldome, Charles Raab, the County of Rockland (“Rockland County”), detectives Ronald Taggart and Mary Murphy, Assistant District Attorneys (“ADAs”) John Grant and Walter J. Green, Jr., and District Attorney (“DA”) Kenneth Gribetz. 1 Plaintiffs claim that these defendants are hable for false arrest, malicious prosecution, abuse of process, intentional infliction of emotional distress and various civil…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Migra v. Warren City School District Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Buckley v. FitzsimmonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Federated Department Stores, Inc. v. MoitieSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- O'Brien v. City of SyracuseNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- Reilly v. ReidNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Gianatasio v. D'AgostinoDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2012
- Antonious v. MuhammadCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
- Colt's Manufacturing Co. v. Devteck Corp.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1997
- Antonious v. MuhammadDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2000
- Dukes v. Cold Spring Harbor Central School District Board of EducationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2021
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.