Legal Opinion
Bearden v. Wyeth
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided May 5, 2006No. CIV.A. 05-4507PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
DALZELL, District Judge.
AND NOW, this 5th day of May, 2006, upon consideration of the parties’ joint stipulation of facts, defendants’ motion to dismiss and for summary judgment 1 (docket entry #33), plaintiffs re sponse thereto, and defendant’s reply, attached to its motion for leave to file reply (docket entry #35), and the Court finding that:(a) In defendants’ previous motion to dismiss, they contended that the laws of Arkansas, not Pennsylvania, apply and that certain claims must therefore be dismissed;(b) Plaintiff disagreed about the applicable law, so to resolve the dispute and…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Cornett v. Johnson & Johnson & Cordis Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2010
- Knipe v. Smithkline BeechamDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2008
- Yocham v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2010
- In Re Vioxx Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2007
- Kallman v. AronchickDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2013
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.