Legal Opinion
Proseus v. Anchor Line, Ltd.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided November 22, 1960PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DIMOCK, District Judge.
Third party defendant has moved to dismiss the complaint of third party plaintiff pursuant to Rule 37(d), F.R.Civ. P., for failure of third party plaintiff to appear for examination before trial.
Plaintiff in this action is a longshoreman employee of third party defendant who claims to have been injured while working aboard the vessel of defendant and third party plaintiff. The third party complaint alleges the primary negligence of third party defendant and the breach of its warranty of workmanlike service.
Third party defendant served upon third party plaintiff three…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Rubin v. General Tire & Rubber Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1955
- Park & Tilford Distillers Corp. v. Distillers Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1956
- Fay v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1958
- Fruit Growers Co-Op. v. California Pie & Baking Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1942
- Klop v. United Fruit Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1955
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Founding Church of Scientology of Washington, D.C., Inc. v. William H. Webster, Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1986
- Sugarhill Records Ltd. v. Motown Record Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1985
- United States v. Afram Lines (USA), Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 1994
- Waters v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- Cleveland v. PalmbyDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1977
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.