Commonwealth Ex Rel. Armstrong v. Collins
Kentucky Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
STEPHENS, Chief Justice.
The basic issue we address is to what extent, if any, the General Assembly of the Commonwealth may, in adopting a budget bill and based on the financial condition of the Commonwealth provide therein for the reduction, elimination and transfer of appropriated funds, and for all practical purposes, provide as a result thereof, that the effectiveness of certain existing statutes is temporarily modified.
BACKGROUND
At its regular session in 1984, the General Assembly passed a biennial budget.1 *439This document appropriated the revenue for the Commonwealth and determined how…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- United States v. WillSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- United States v. DickersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Legislative Research Commission Ex Rel. Prather v. BrownKentucky Supreme Court · 1984
- Board of Penitentiary Commissioners v. SpencerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1914
- Lovelace v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1941
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- Yeoman v. Com., Health Policy Bd.Kentucky Supreme Court · 1998
- Kuprion v. FitzgeraldKentucky Supreme Court · 1994
- Baker v. FletcherKentucky Supreme Court · 2006
- Fletcher v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2005
- Grayson County Board of Education v. CaseyKentucky Supreme Court · 2005
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.