Toms v. Hartford Fire Insurance
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By ROSS, P. J.:
This review presents an appeal on questions of law from a judgment of the Municipal Court of Cincinnati, in favor of the plaintiff. The trial was to the court without a jury.
The action was brought by the plaintiff to recover damages for the breach of a contract of insurance which covered loss by theft and provided that the defendant insurer would defend any suit brought against the plaintiff “as respects insurance afforded by this endorsement.”
The clause in the policy so providing is as follows:
“It is further agreed that the Company, as respects insurance afforded by…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Van Vechten v. American Eagle Fire InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
- Jolly v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Home Ins. Co. of New York v. TrammellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935
- Deal v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Michigan Commercial Insurance v. WillsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1914
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Plumbing v. Merchants Mutual Casualty Co.City of New York Municipal Court · 1949