Legal Opinion

Michigan Commercial Insurance v. Wills

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided November 20, 1914No. 8,456PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Prom Clinton Circuit Court; LeBoy B. Nash, Judge. Action by Herbert P. Wills against the Michigan Commercial Insurance Company of Lansing, Michigan. Prom a judgment for plaintiff, the defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtHotter, J.

This is a suit by appellee against appellant on a policy of insurance by which appellee’s automobile was insured against “loss or damage in excess of $25, on each occasion of theft, robbery or pilferage by persons other than those in the employment, service or household of the as*257sured.” There was a trial by the court and a special finding on which the court stated its conclusion in appellee’s favor and rendered judgment accordingly.

An exception to the conclusion of law presents the controlling question relied on for a reversal of such judgment. The court finds among other facts the following…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. People v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Hartford Fire Insurance v. WimbishCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1913
  3. Robinson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Mug v. OstendorfIndiana Court of Appeals · 1911
  5. Starck v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1878

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Van Vechten v. American Eagle Fire InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
  2. Phoenix Assurance Co. v. EppsteinSupreme Court of Florida · 1917
  3. Great American Mutual Indemnity Co. v. MeyerOhio Court of Appeals · 1924
  4. Kovero v. Hudson Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1934
  5. LaMotte v. Retail Hardware Mutual Fire InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API