Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Lebo

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 24, 1998No. 705PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OLSZEWSKI, Judge:

This appeal requires us to consider whether a trial court may impose an Accelerated Rehabilitative Disposition (ARD) condition that authorizes a county parole office to provide the specific terms of the program. We find that the trial court may do so and accordingly affirm.

Russell H. Lebo (appellant) was charged with indecent assault1 and corruption of minors 2 on September 28, 1995. Before trial, the Union County Court of Common Pleas admitted appellant to ARD. Among other conditions, the trial court required appellant to “be supervised by the Union County Adult Probation…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. PierceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  2. Commonwealth v. EdmistonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  3. Commonwealth v. LutzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  4. Commonwealth v. WidmerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  5. Commonwealth v. ChilcoteSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. PursellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  2. Commonwealth v. OreeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  3. Lang v. Commonwealth, Department of TransportationCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  4. Commonwealth v. GanoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  5. Commonwealth v. CappelloSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API