Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Widmer

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 18, 1997No. 60 E.D. Appeal Docket 1996PublishedCited by 57 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

FLAHERTY, Chief Justice.

Following his conviction and sentencing for rape, appellant, Barry Widmer, Jr., elected to forgo the optional post-sentence motion under recently amended Pa.R.Crim.P. 1410 A.(3),† choosing the option of a notice of appeal to the Superior Court. In response to appellant’s concise statement of matters complained of on appeal, the trial court filed an opinion in support of the judgment of sentence pursuant to Pa.R.AP. 1925.

*139One of the issues raised on appeal was a challenge to the weight of the evidence. The trial court, in its Rule 1925 opinion, held…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BrownSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  2. Commonwealth v. HodgeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  3. Commonwealth v. WidmerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995

3Cited by57 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. WidmerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  2. Commonwealth v. AntidormiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  3. Commonwealth v. BorreroSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  4. Commonwealth v. CooperSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  5. Commonwealth v. NicholsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API