Legal Opinion

State v. Roman

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided April 11, 1989No. 12986PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

HAYASHI, J.

Plaintiff-Appellant State of Hawaii (State) appeals the order suppressing the confessions made by Defendant-Appellee Haila Diane Roman (Roman). After using a polygraph examination to verify rape charges filed by Roman, the investigating police officers had suspected that she was lying, questioned her about the accusations without first giving Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966) warnings (Miranda warnings), and then obtained oral plus written confessions admitting to fabricating the allegations. The trial court had ruled that the police had improperly…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Colorado v. SpringSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. United States v. BayerSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  4. Wyrick v. FieldsSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. State v. WyattHawaii Supreme Court · 1984

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Marine v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1992
  2. State v. KaneHawaii Supreme Court · 1998
  3. State v. KetchumHawaii Supreme Court · 2001
  4. State v. JosephHawaii Supreme Court · 2006
  5. State v. McKnight.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2013

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API