Legal Opinion

Warrington 611 Associates v. Aetna Life Insurance

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided February 7, 1989No. Civ. A. 87-2870PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WOLIN, District Judge.

This is a case involving a promissory note and a mortgage on commercial property. Plaintiff, the property owner, claims that defendant, the note holder and mortgagee, improperly refused its consent to plaintiff’s sale of the property and that plaintiff suffered adverse tax consequences and other damages as a result thereof. Plaintiff seeks damages and relief under the Declaratory Judgment Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 2201, 2202. Jurisdiction is based on diversity of citizenship. 1

The parties have filed cross-motions for summary judgment. The Court will grant defendant’s…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Fidelity Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. De La CuestaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. La Sala v. American Savings & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Coast Bank v. MinderhoutCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Sonny Arnold, Inc. v. Sentry Savings Ass'nTexas Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Tucker v. Lassen Savings & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. Promenade Towers Mutual Housing Corp.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1990
  2. Shi v. Wolfsdorf Rosenthal CA2/5California Court of Appeal · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API