Legal Opinion

Leppley v. Smith

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 18, 1927No. Appeal 58PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Gawthrop, J.,

Plaintiff has appealed in an action for slander which resulted in a verdict for him for six cents. The statement of claim averred that he was engaged in the automobile repair business in the City of Lancaster; that defendant came into his place of business and said to him in the presence and hearing of others: “You stole a battery out of my car and put an old worn-out battery in,” and that as a result thereof plaintiff not only suffered general damages but that he lost the trade of '“divers persons who used to have dealing and business with him in his lawful trade. ’ ’…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Clark v. North American Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1902
  2. Palmer v. Leader Publishing Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1898
  3. Burkhart v. North American Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1906
  4. Leitz v. HohmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1901
  5. Chubb v. GsellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1859

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Will (Nat. News Co.) v. Press Pub. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  2. Kahermanes v. MarcheseDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1973
  3. Eulo v. Deval Aerodynamics, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1969
  4. Liacopoulos v. CoumoulisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
  5. Huber v. Patriot Co., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Dauphin County1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API