State v. Ward
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtSwanson, J.
The defendant, Frederick Ward, appeals the trial court’s ruling excluding expert testimony on eyewitness identification. We affirm.
Between December 14 and December 22, 1986, a series of four robberies was committed at hotels in the Seattle area. During each robbery, the night clerk at each hotel was able to observe the robber from a distance of 2 to 3 feet. One of the clerks, who witnessed two of the robberies, identified Ward in a police photo montage presented to him on January 16, 1987. The other two clerks identified Ward in a police lineup conducted January 27, 1987.
By amended…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. AlleryWashington Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. CoeWashington Supreme Court · 1988
- Walker v. BangsWashington Supreme Court · 1979
- State v. MoonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1986
- State v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1988
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. CheatamWashington Supreme Court · 2003
- State v. HernandezCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1990
- State v. BellCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1990
- State Of Washington, V Darlene Marie GreenCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
- State v. CheatamWashington Supreme Court · 2003
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.