Legal Opinion

State v. Ward

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided August 21, 1989No. 21231-1-IPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSwanson, J.

The defendant, Frederick Ward, appeals the trial court’s ruling excluding expert testimony on eyewitness identification. We affirm.

Between December 14 and December 22, 1986, a series of four robberies was committed at hotels in the Seattle area. During each robbery, the night clerk at each hotel was able to observe the robber from a distance of 2 to 3 feet. One of the clerks, who witnessed two of the robberies, identified Ward in a police photo montage presented to him on January 16, 1987. The other two clerks identified Ward in a police lineup conducted January 27, 1987.

By amended…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. AlleryWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  2. State v. CoeWashington Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Walker v. BangsWashington Supreme Court · 1979
  4. State v. MoonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1986
  5. State v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1988

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. CheatamWashington Supreme Court · 2003
  2. State v. HernandezCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1990
  3. State v. BellCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1990
  4. State Of Washington, V Darlene Marie GreenCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
  5. State v. CheatamWashington Supreme Court · 2003

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API