Legal Opinion
State v. Bell
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided April 2, 1990No. 23444-7-IPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSwanson, J.
The defendant, Marvin Bell, appeals his conviction for first degree robbery. He challenges the trial court's ruling excluding certain aspects of expert testimony on eyewitness identification and the trial court's selection of an interpreter for the victim at trial. We affirm.
By amended information filed October 26, 1988, Bell was charged with first degree robbery. The following facts were established at trial.
On August 9, 1988, at approximately 8 a.m., Nafisa Zarif was severely beaten and robbed of her purse while walking home after visiting her husband at Providence Hospital. Although Zarif…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- State v. AlleryWashington Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. CoeWashington Supreme Court · 1988
- Walker v. BangsWashington Supreme Court · 1979
- State v. MoonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1986
- John Winston Prince v. Dr. George J. Beto, Director, Texas Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. Van TranTennessee Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. CheatamWashington Supreme Court · 2003
- State v. CervantesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1991
- State v. Kan Ting FungCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1995
- State v. CheatamWashington Supreme Court · 2003
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.