Legal Opinion

United States v. Domingo Manuel-Baca

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided January 26, 1970No. 23079_1PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BYRNE, District Judge:

Appellant Baca was convicted of violating 21 U.S.C. § 174, by verdict of a jury.

On October 14, 1967, about 9:00 P.M., a Nogales, Arizona, police officer, Sgt. Salmon, saw Baca and a companion named Duran, coming down a steep hill near the International Boundary. There was no roadway or path on the hill, “It is just grass”. The boundary is marked with an 8-foot fence. In October, 1967, in the area in which Baca and Duran were seen descending the hill, there were three holes in the fence — one about half *782way up the hill, one three-quarters of the way, and the third, a big…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. Lavender v. KurnSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. Tennant v. Peoria & Pekin Union Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  4. Tiller v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  5. Bailey v. Central Vermont Railway, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Johnson v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Torncello v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1982
  3. United States v. Burdette George WinnCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
  4. United States v. Donald Lee GreenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
  5. United States v. Magdaleno Hermosillo-Nanez, United States of America v. Mario Carrasco-GarciaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API