Carnes v. Shores
Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
WRIGHT, Presiding Judge.
The question presented by this appeal is whether an attorney may intervene, after abandonment by his client, in an action to determine and collect the amount due under a prior decree for alimony. The purpose of such intervention being to establish and enforce an attorney’s lien under Title 46, Sec. 64 of the Code of Alabama (1940).
Appellant represented Dessie Lee Shores in a divorce suit against her husband, E. V. Shores. A decree of divorce and alimony was obtained. Approximately one year later Mrs. Shores secured the service of appellant for determination and…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Rochelle v. RochelleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1938
- O'Neal v. O'NealSupreme Court of Alabama · 1969
- Bell v. BellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1926
- Johnson v. GeraldSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
- Wade v. KaySupreme Court of Alabama · 1923
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Brown v. ParnellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1980
- McGugin v. McGuginCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1978
- Triplett v. ElliottSupreme Court of Alabama · 1991
- Andrews v. CITY NAT. BANK OF BIRMINGHAMSupreme Court of Alabama · 1977
- Samuel J. Stoorman & Associates, P.C. v. DixonSupreme Court of Colorado · 2017
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.