Legal Opinion
Samuel J. Stoorman & Associates, P.C. v. Dixon
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided May 15, 2017No. Supreme Court Case No. 15SC710PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Boatright
¶1 Samuel J. Stoorman & Associates, P.C. (“the Firm”), represented Kristy Casagranda (“Wife”) during dissolution proceedings against her then-husband Brian Todd Dixon (“Husband”). The Firm asserted a charging lien for its fees under Colorado’s attorney’s *693lien statute against assets the court awarded to Wife during the divorce and obtained a court order recognizing that lien. The firm later filed a motion for an entry of judgment enforcing its charging lien against maintenance payments Husband owed to Wife, seeking to have Husband redirect those payments to the Firm. The trial court denied the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Vigil v. FranklinSupreme Court of Colorado · 2004
- Swieckowski Ex Rel. Swieckowski v. City of Fort CollinsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1997
- Resolution Trust Corp. v. HeisermanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995
- Jasper v. SmithSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
- Rodriguez v. SchuttSupreme Court of Colorado · 1996
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Foster v. PlockSupreme Court of Colorado · 2017
- Tana Edwards v. New Century Hospice, Inc. Legacy Hospice, LLC, d/b/a New Century Hospice of Denver, LLC Legacy Hospice of Colorado Springs, LLC and Kathleen Mary Johnson. Rule Discharged en banc CHIEF JUSTICE BOATRIGHTSupreme Court of Colorado · 2023
- v. SCC PuebloColorado Court of Appeals · 2019
- Ruybalid IV v. Board of County Commissioners of Las Animas CountyColorado Court of Appeals · 2017
- Doe v. Cherry Creek School DistrictDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2025
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.