Legal Opinion
USA v. Volvo Powertrain Corporation
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided April 13, 2012No. Civil Action No. 1998-2547PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
ROYCE C. LAMBERTH, Chief Judge.
This dispute concerns a consent decree to which the United States and Volvo Powertrain Corporation are parties. Volvo Powertrain has assumed the obligations of Volvo Truck Corporation, the original signatory to the decree. The California Air Resources Board, which signed a substantially identical settlement agreement with Volvo Truck, has intervened. Before the Court is Volvo Powertrain’s motion for judicial review of the demand by the United States for stipulated penalties pursuant to the decree. Powertrain asks the Court to find either that…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- City of Chicago v. International College of SurgeonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- United States v. ITT Continental Baking Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Roy E. Bowden v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- United States v. Volvo Powertrain CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2014
- United States v. Volvo Construction Equipment AbDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Gov't of Guam v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Heckmann Building Products Inc. v. Hohmann & Barnard, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2012
- Government of Guam v. United States Department of NavyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2018
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.