Legal Opinion

United States v. Volvo Construction Equipment Ab

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided February 13, 2013No. Civil Action No. 2012-1402PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

ROYCE C. LAMBERTH, Chief Judge.

The United States brought this action against defendant Volvo Construction Equipment AB (“VCE”) alleging violations of the Clean Air Act (“CAA”) and regulations promulgated thereunder. The case was assigned to the undersigned judge as a related case to United States v. Volvo Powertrain, 98-cv-2547. See Pl.’s Notice of Related Case, ECF No. 2. VCE objects to the United States’ filing this as a related case. Def.’s Mot. for Reassignment (“Def.’s Objection”), ECF No. 8. The Court agrees with VCE’s objections and will transfer the case to the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Stewart v. O'NEILLDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2002
  2. Tripp v. Executive Office of PresidentDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2000
  3. Keepseagle v. GlickmanDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2000
  4. AUTUMN JOURNEY HOSPICE, INC. v. SebeliusDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
  5. USA v. Volvo Powertrain CorporationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Singh v. McConvilleDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
  2. American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations v. TrumpDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2025
  3. Millard v. Government of the District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API