Legal Opinion

Mancl v. Chatterton (In Re Mancl)

District Court, W.D. Wisconsin

Decided February 12, 2008No. 07-cv-0582-bbcPublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

BARBARA B. CRABB, District Judge.

Debtors Daniel and Carol Mancl appeal from the final order of the bankruptcy court denying confirmation of their chapter 13 plan for failure to provide sufficient payments to general unsecured creditors. Jurisdiction over the appeal is based on 28 U.S.C. § 158(a)(1). I conclude that the sufficiency of payments to general unsecured creditors is governed by 11 U.S.C. § 1325(b) and that the debtors’ chapter 13 plan conforms to its requirements. Accordingly, the debtors’ plan must be confirmed.

I find the following facts material and undisputed for…

2Cases cited10 opinions

In the Matter of Kenneth W. Smith, Debtor. Appeal of State of IndianaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
In Re AlexanderUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2006
In Re JassUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Utah · 2006
In Re SlusherUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Nevada · 2007
In Re BarrUnited States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2006

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

Hildebrand v. Kimbro (In Re Kimbro)Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Sixth Circuit · 2008
In Re WilliamsUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Colorado · 2008
In Re Van Bodegom SmithUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2008
In Re RoyalUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 2008
In Re WilsonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2008

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.