Legal Opinion
In Re Williams
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Colorado
Decided September 12, 2008No. 19-10696PublishedCited by 44 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
ELIZABETH E. BROWN, Bankruptcy Judge.
In each of these cases, the standing Chapter 13 trustee (the “Trustee”) objects to plan confirmation on the grounds that the proposed plans fail to use the proper methodology under BAPCPA 1 to calculate the debtor’s projected disposable income and/or the plans fail to provide for payment of all of the debtor’s disposable income over the applicable commitment period-five years in these cases. This opinion examines the new amendments to 11 U.S.C. § 1325(b) and in this context addresses: (1) how “projected disposable income” is to be calculated; (2) to…
2Cases cited49 opinions
- United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- United Sav. Assn. of Tex. v. Timbers of Inwood Forest Associates, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Negonsott v. SamuelsSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- In Re Julian Roosevelt Goeb and Jane Alma Goeb, Debtors. In Re Julian Roosevelt Goeb and Jane Alma Goeb v. Harry W. Heid, Chapter 13 TrusteeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- Gordon R. And Sharon L. Flygare, Debtors-Appellants v. Judith A. BouldenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1983
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- Baud v. CarrollCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2011
- In re: David C. Welsh and Sharon N. WelshUnited States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Carroll v. SandersCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
- In Re SandbergUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Kansas · 2010
- In Re SharpUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Colorado · 2009
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.