Legal Opinion

Bardere v. Zafir

New York Court of Appeals

Decided October 11, 1984PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.

*852On appeal by defendants Zafir and Brooklyn Garbage Bag Co. from an order of Special Term which had denied their motion under CPLR 3211 to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a cause of action and as barred by the Workers’ Compensation Law, plaintiff, for the first time, asked in the Appellate Division that if the order of Special Term were reversed and the motion were granted he be given leave to replead to set out a theory of successor liability under Billy v Consolidated Mach. Tool Corp.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Schumacher v. Richards Shear Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. Billy v. Consolidated Machine Tool Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1980
  3. Sanders v. SchifferNew York Court of Appeals · 1976

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Janssen v. Incorporated Village of Rockville CentreAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  2. Ott v. Automatic Connector, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  3. Abelman v. Shoratlantic Development Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  4. Markwica v. DavisNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. Thomas v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API