Legal Opinion

Sanders v. Schiffer

New York Court of Appeals

Decided April 6, 1976PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Memorandum. The order of the Appellate Division should be modified. The granting of the motions to dismiss the complaint and to cancel the associated notice of pendency should be affirmed. Such affirmance, however, is without prejudice to the right of appellants, if they be so advised, to apply at Special Term for leave to serve an amended complaint, notwithstanding that they failed to state a desire to plead again in their opposing papers and that they do not urge such disposition now. On such application, if any, a copy of the proposed amended complaint shall be submitted to the court,…

2Cited by20 opinions

  1. A.J. Temple Marble & Tile, Inc. v. Union Carbide Marble Care, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1996
  2. Janssen v. Incorporated Village of Rockville CentreAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  3. People v. New York City Transit AuthorityNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  4. Bardere v. ZafirNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. Antel Oldsmobile-Cadillac, Inc. v. Sirus Leasing Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API