Janssen v. Incorporated Village of Rockville Centre
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Rivera, J.P.
On the instant appeal, we consider, inter alia, the issue of whether a motion for leave to replead, pursuant to the current version of CPLR 3211 (e), is subject to any time limitation. In 2005, the Legislature amended CPLR 3211 (e). Although this amendment did not prescribe any time limitation within which a party may move for leave to replead, the defendants invite this Court to “fill the temporal gap” and impose a 30-day limitation, akin to a motion for leave to reargue pursuant to CPLR 2221 (d) (3). For the reasons that follow, we decline the defendants’…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Rovello v. Orofino Realty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1976
- Majewski v. Broadalbin-Perth Central School DistrictNew York Court of Appeals · 1998
- Lucido v. MancusoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Chemical Specialties Manufacturers Ass'n v. JorlingNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Canzona v. AtanasioAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- People v. OvertonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- New York Telephone Co. v. Supervisor of Town of North HempsteadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- People v. HillAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Influx Capital, LLC v. PershinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.