Legal Opinion
Bolstad v. State
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided January 24, 1989No. C3-88-2259PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
SPECIAL TERM OPINION
WOZNIAK, Chief Judge.
FACTS
By postconviction petition in January 1988, Bolstad challenged a felony point and a custody point included in his criminal history score at the time of sentencing in 1987. The trial judge, by order filed September 2, 1988, agreed that the felony point should not be included, but refused to subtract the custody point. The state timely appealed from that order. After the time for appeal expired, Bolstad served a notice of review. The state moves to dismiss the notice of review, claiming it is not authorized in appeals from postconviction orders.
DECIS…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Fay v. NoiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. HaymanSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- State v. KnafflaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- Case v. NebraskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- State Ex Rel. Roy v. TahashSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Waynewood v. StateCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996