State Ex Rel. Roy v. Tahash
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Rogosheske, Justice.
This case and four other cases decided today 1 all raise the question of the necessity of a plenary evidentiary hearing in a habeas corpus proceedings which under our recent decisions has been enlarged in scope and made available to state prisoners as a transitional postconviction remedy for the hearing of alleged violations of fundamental rights.
In all of the cases reviewed the petitions for the writ were filed after the time to appeal from the judgment of conviction had lapsed. In all save one — where there was a trial — the judgments of conviction followed pleas of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Townsend v. SainSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Fay v. NoiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Case v. NebraskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- State Ex Rel. Holm v. TahashSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
- State ex rel. Cable v. TahashSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- Riley v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
- Roby v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
- Hodgson v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
- State v. VangSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2014
- Ferguson v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.