Grant v. King
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action in the municipal court of St. Paul to recover possession of certain rings or $445, the value thereof, and for $20.40 for the detention of the rings. The ease was tried before Hanft, J\, who made findings and as conclusions of law found that plaintiff was entitled to tbe rings or $445, their value. Prom an order denying defendant’s motion for a new trial, be appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtStart, C. J.
This action was brought in the municipal court of tbe city of St. Paul to recover from tbe defendant tbe possession of two diamond rings, or their value, $445, in case a recovery of tbe possession thereof could not be bad.
Tbe complaint alleged that tbe plaintiff was tbe owner of tbe rings, and their value; that she delivered them to the defendant to secure tbe payment of a loan of $105, for which she executed to tbe defendant her promissory note; that at tbe maturity'of the note she duly tendered to tbe defendant tbe amount due on tbe note and demanded tbe return of tbe rings; that tbe…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Kramer v. GardnerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
- Wheaton Roller-Mill Co. v. John T. Noye Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
- Locke v. First Div. of the St. Paul & Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1870
- Rooney v. KoenigSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
- Sayre v. BurdickSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Meland v. YoungbergSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
- Jimmerson v. Troy Seed Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
- Shinners v. FordSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1922
- Thiem v. EckertSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
- Dawson County State Bank v. DurlandNebraska Supreme Court · 1926
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.