Legal Opinion
Shinners v. Ford
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided February 10, 1922No. 22,462PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Taylor, C.
On March 9, 1920, defendant made an agreement with plaintiffs in the following terms:
“You are hereby appointed my sole agent and requested and authorized to negotiate the sale of, and to sell for me, the following property, for the price and terms herewith given you, and for the commission herewith agreed upon, which I agree to. pay you if a sale or any disposition of the property is made directly or indirectly through your- efforts and services, or if sold by myself or through any other agent during the continuance of this agency. You- are hereby authorized to accept a deposit to…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Kramer v. GardnerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
- Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Ry. Co. v. Home Ins.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
- Samuel H. Chute Co. v. LattaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
- Rooney v. KoenigSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
- Sayre v. BurdickSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- McCreight v. Davey Tree Expert Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1934
- Merchants National Bank v. BryngelsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
- Brown v. BackerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
- In Re Estate of HoreSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1946
- School District No. 1 v. Security State BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.