Legal Opinion
Paul C. Villano v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided November 5, 1962No. 7060_1PublishedCited by 84 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LEWIS, Circuit Judge.
The appellant-defendant was indicted, tried by jury and convicted within the District of Colorado of failing to pay the special occupational tax imposed on his business of accepting bets on the outcome of football games, 26 U.S.C.A. §§ 4411, 4412(a), 4901 and 7262. The single appellate contention is that the trial court erred in denying appellant’s motion to suppress certain evidence obtained by state officers and admittedly material to and used against appellant in the federal prosecution. The evidence was obtained without authority of search warrant, warrant of arrest…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Elkins v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- United States v. Ernest T. PageCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
- John F. Wilson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1955
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by84 opinions
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- United States v. Lenin M. Jerez and Carlos M. SolisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
- United States v. Miguel Angel RecaldeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1985
- United States v. HoffaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1965
- United States v. Thomas Stanley WerkingCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
79 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.