Legal Opinion
JYSK Bed'N Linen v. MONOSIJ DUTTA-ROY
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided December 16, 2015No. 13-15309PublishedCited by 43 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TJOFLAT, Circuit Judge:
The Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act, § 43(d) of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1125(d), provides: “A person shall be liable ... by the owner of a mark ... if ... that person ... has a bad faith intent to profit from that mark ...; and ... registers, traffics in, or uses a domain name that ... is identical or confusingly similar to that mark.” Id. § 1125(d)(1)(A). In this case, the District Court granted Jysk Bed’N Linen an injunction requiring Monosij Dutta-Roy to transfer to Jysk four domain names he had registered in his own name. The court also granted Jysk’s…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Amoco Production Co. v. Village of GambellSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Ebay Inc. v. Mercexchange, L. L. C.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Monsanto Co. v. Geertson Seed FarmsSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Klay v. United Healthgroup, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- State of Georgia v. President of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2022
- Vital Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Christopher AlfieriCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2022
- Agri Processor Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2008
- Casa Dimitri Corp. v. Invicta Watch Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2017
- Agilysys, Inc. v. HallDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2017
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.