Legal Opinion

General Environmental Science Corp. v. Horsfall

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided May 29, 1992No. 1:90 CV 1340PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

BATTISTI, District Judge.

This case came before the Court for a hearing on April 21, 1992, on the issue of damages, attorney fees and costs. Based upon the evidence and argument presented at the hearing, together with such evidence already of record in this case, the Court makes the following findings of fact and conclusions of law.

FINDINGS OF FACT

1. General Environmental Science Corporation (“GES”) is a corporation headquartered in Cleveland, Ohio which sells live-liquid micro organism (“LLMO”). The product is sold in the United States and around the world, and is used to treat waste…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Story Parchment Co. v. Paterson Parchment Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Comdyne I, Inc. v. CorbinCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
  3. Dundee Cement Company v. Howard Pipe & Concrete Products, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
  4. Preston v. MurtyOhio Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Adolph Coors Company v. Movement Against Racism and the KlanCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Okocha v. FehrenbacherOhio Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. General Motors Corp. v. Ignacio Lopez De ArriortuaDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API