Legal Opinion

Nelson v. Hazel

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided September 30, 1965No. 9539PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SMITH, Justice.

• Respondent instituted this action to foreclose laborer’s and materialman’s lien on appellants’ real property. In his complaint respondent alleges that he performed labor and furnished materials of the reasonable value of $5,090.86 in the remodeling, alteration and construction of appellants’ dwelling house; that appellants paid $1,997.51 on the account, and refused to pay the balance of $3,093.35. Respondent also seeks attorneys’ fees and costs, and foreclosure of the lien on, and sale of, the property.

Appellants in their answer admit that pursuant to an oral understanding…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Pierstorff v. Gray's Auto ShopIdaho Supreme Court · 1937
  2. White v. MitchellWashington Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Forrester v. CraddockWashington Supreme Court · 1957
  4. National Ro-Tile Corporation v. LoomisIdaho Supreme Court · 1960
  5. In Re Odberg's EstateIdaho Supreme Court · 1947

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Ervin Construction Co. v. Van OrdenIdaho Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Gilbert v. City of CaldwellIdaho Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. Lewis v. Anchorage Asphalt Paving Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Fuller v. WoltersIdaho Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Hafer v. HornIdaho Supreme Court · 1973

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API